首页> 外文OA文献 >Institutional conditions for Swedish metal production : a comparison of subsidies to metal mining and metal recycling
【2h】

Institutional conditions for Swedish metal production : a comparison of subsidies to metal mining and metal recycling

机译:瑞典金属生产的制度条件:对金属开采和金属回收的补贴比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article examines and contrasts the level of Swedish governmental subsidies to two different ways of producing metal: the metal recycling sector and the metal mining sector. In 2010, the metal mining sector was subsidized by € 40 million and the metal recycling sector € 0.6 million. If the exemption from landfill tax is considered a subsidy, the level of subsidization to the metal mining sector changes drastically to approximately € 4000 million. Regardless of how the concept “subsidy” is defined, the metal mining sector in total and per tonne of metal produced is fundamentally more highly subsidized than the metal recycling sector. The value added per tonne of metal produced for the metal recycling sector appears to be higher than for the metal mining sector. The current dominant trend in the Swedish mineral strategy is nevertheless to increase the level of subsidization to the metal mining sector.
机译:本文研究并对比了瑞典政府对两种不同金属生产方式的补贴水平:金属回收部门和金属采矿部门。 2010年,金属采矿业获得4000万欧元的补贴,金属回收业获得60万欧元的补贴。如果免征垃圾掩埋税被视为补贴,那么对金属采矿业的补贴水平将急剧变化,达到约40亿欧元。无论如何定义“补贴”概念,从根本上说,金属采矿部门在总产量和每吨金属中的补贴都比金属回收部门更高。金属回收部门生产的每吨金属的增加值似乎高于金属采矿部门。尽管如此,瑞典矿产战略目前的主要趋势是增加对金属采矿业的补贴水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号